Legal Opinion

Petkus v. Bankas

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCarswell, J.

This is a motion made by the defendant for judgment under section 476 of the Civil Practice Act. It is made upon the pleadings and bill of particulars. The amended complaint, defendant claims, fails to state a cause of action in that while purporting to proceed upon the theory of a rescission of a contract made by plaintiff with the defendant, which contract has not been performed by the defendant in any particular, it fails to allege a rescission or facts constituting a rescission; that on the contrary, such facts as it pleads are insufficent in law to be a rescission.

Plaintiff conceded he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gould v. . Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Gravenhorst v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Raymond v. BearnardNew York Supreme Court · 1815
  5. Chrysler v. . RenoisNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perutz v. Bohemian Discount Bank in LiquidationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API