Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sunflower v. Bladorn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 31, 2000No. 97F 916-356; CA A101790Published

1DissentLandau, J.

This case is about the rules of statutory construction and whether this court will follow them. At issue is the meaning of ORS 90.380(1), which uses the statutory term “posting” a dwelling that fails to meet health and safety standards. Usually, “posting” refers to nailing or otherwise affixing a notice to a wall or a post. That is, in fact, how the term is used elsewhere in the statute; indeed, it is how the term is used throughout the Oregon Revised Statutes. It is also how the term is used in relevant housing authority regulations and is, according to the legislative history, how the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. Vasquez-RubioOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Fernandez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API