Legal Opinion
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Ross
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 11, 2006No. 2005-0750PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Respondent, Leo Patrick Ross of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0031061, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1975. On December 8, 2003, relator, the Columbus Bar Association, charged respondent with violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. A panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline heard the cause and made findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a recommendation, all of which the board adopted.
Misconduct
{¶ 2} The allegations of misconduct arose from respondent’s defense of James Jeffrey Brown II, in the United States District…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MattisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- In re Complaint Against Judge HarperOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Columbus Bar Ass'n v. DoughertyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BrooksOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. HopeOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. MarosanOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.