Adkins v. Comcar Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Finney, Chief Justice:
We granted certiorari to review the Court of Appeals’ opinion in Adkins v. Comcar Industries, Inc., 316 S.C. 149, 447 S.E. (2d) 228 (Ct. App. 1994). We affirm.
FACTS
John Adkins (Father) sought to recover workers’ compensation benefits for the death of his son Stephen Adkins. Mary Hutto (Mother) contested Father’s entitlement to any death benefits. The single commissioner and full commission ruled Father was not entitled to receive any benefits from son’s work-related death because he had abandoned his son long before his son’s death. The commission concluded Mr. Adkins…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First Baptist Church of Mauldin v. City of MauldinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Bush v. Gingrey Bros.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
- Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Bass v. IsochemCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Georgia-Carolina Bail Bonds, Inc. v. County of AikenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
- Jones v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- State v. SweatCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.