J. H. Davis & Bro. v. Dallas National Bank
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HEAD, Associate Justice.
We find no reversible error in the refusal of the court to consolidate this cause with cause number 328, in which the Decatur National Bank was plaintiff, and these appellants were defendants, as claimants. We believe, however, the better practice would have been to have consolidated the cases, notwithstanding separate bonds were given. Our statute passed since the levy of these attachments (2 Sayles’ Civil Statutes, articles 4823, 4843), contemplates that but one judgment will be rendered against the claimant for the value of the property, which will be ordered paid…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fort Worth Publishing Co. v. Hitson & ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Elser v. GraberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- First National Bank of Colorado v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Gunter & Summerfield v. CobbTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Young v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clayton v. Western Nat. Walt Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Texas Brewing Co. v. BissoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Bow v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937