Allen v. State

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court for Scotts Bluff county for a violation of the liquor laws. It is contended that the judgment is erroneous because (1) a former conviction in the county court for the same county is a bar to this prosecution, (2) the action of the trial court in permitting an indorsement of a witness’ name on the complaint at the time of trial and refusing a *723continuance was error, (3) and chapter 93, Laws 1933, under which the complaint was filed was unconstitutional and void.

It appears that a complaint was filed in the county court charging a crime…