Legal Opinion

Day v. Metropolitan Utilities District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1927No. 25232PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGood, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused in consequence of the negligence of defendant. In its answer defendant denied negligence and alleged contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff and his failure to file a claim with defendant and give notice of the time, place and cause of and circumstances attending his injury, as prescribed by section 3746, Comp. St. 1922. In his reply plaintiff denied contributory negligence. Plaintiff had the Verdict and judgment thereon, and defendant appealed.

Defendant is a public corporation created by law for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trumble v. TrumbleNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Miller v. HurfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  3. State ex rel. Graham v. TibbetsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Armstrong v. MayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  5. State ex rel. Douglas County v. CornellNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Roth v. BlomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Simon v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Buresh v. GeorgeNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Moeller, McPherrin & Judd v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Monasmith v. Cosden Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API