Claim of Robinson v. Estate of Hayes
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Van Kirk, J.:
The claimant, Harold A. Robinson, has established a contract or agreement between Ida M. Hayes and himself, which is found by the surrogate on satisfactory proof in form as follows: “ That in November, 1919, the deceased Ida M. Hayes proposed to Harold A. Robinson, the claimant, that if he would cease his *719employment, take an entrance examination into Pratt Institute and pass said examinations and enter Said institution for a course of study of two (2) years, that she, the said Ida M. Hayes, would, on his entrance, set aside a sum of three thousand ($3,000) dollars, which the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Ward v. . HasbrouckNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- King v. . LeightonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Broadwell v. GetmanNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. LichtensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carl H. Neuman, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Otis G. Pike, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Gluckman v. HolzmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
- Park Ave. Assoc. in Radiology, P.C. v. NicholsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- In re the Estate of GalvinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- Smith v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.