Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Galvin

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 29, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Henderson, S.

The objections of George Murphy and his daughter, Esther Murphy, concern the non-payment of their respective claims. Each claim is based on an alleged oral agreement by the testatrix, made on or about July 1, 1923, that if Esther Murphy, then fifteen years of age, would attend the Ursuline Academy, a boarding academy in Wilmington, Del., and was graduated therefrom, she would pay this claimant $20,000 by making a provision therefor in her will, and that if George Murphy would *547send his said daughter to that academy and pay for her tuition and maintenance thereat, she would…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  2. In re McGowanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  3. In re the Estate of LiellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  4. Claim of Robinson v. Estate of HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  5. Claim of Robinson v. Estate of HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nakamura v. FujiiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API