Legal Opinion

Fifth Third Bank v. Stanek

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2004No. 49A02-0308-CV-741PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

Appellant Fifth Third Bank, Indiana ("Fifth Third") brings this interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of its motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 12(C). We affirm.

Issue

The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly denied Fifth Third's motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Facts and Procedural History

This case arises out of the theft of a coin collection owned by Appellee Gloria Stanek ("Stanek") and stored in a safe deposit box at Fifth Third's safe deposit box facility located in Indianapolis, Indiana. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Ameritech Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Parke State Bank v. AkersIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. First National Bank of Danville v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Welbourn v. Peoples Loan & Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keene v. Marion County Superior CourtIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Murray v. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Iannetta v. EdwardsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Murray v. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API