People v. Flowers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrero, J.), dated February 15, 2005, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant’s contention that the hearing court’s use of the risk assessment instrument (hereinafter RAI) prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (hereinafter the Board) *691denied him due process is without merit (see People v Bligen, 33 AD3d 489 [2006]). The hearing court accepts the RAI as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. David W.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- New York State Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders v. RansomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. BligenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. GuitardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. ReedeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. NowickiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. WindhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.