State v. King
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WHICHARD, Judge.
Defendant contends the court erred in refusing his request for a voir dire to “qualify” an identification witness.
The general rule in this State is that the failure ... to hold a voir dire examination and make findings of fact upon objection by a defendant to an in-court identification, while not approved, will be deemed harmless error where the record shows that the pretrial identification was proper or that the in-court identification of defendant had an origin independent from the pretrial identification.
State v. Jordan, 49 N.C. App. 561, 565, 272 S.E. 2d 405, 408 (1980).…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984