Legal Opinion

State v. King

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1983No. 8215SC1336PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court erred in refusing his request for a voir dire to “qualify” an identification witness.

The general rule in this State is that the failure ... to hold a voir dire examination and make findings of fact upon objection by a defendant to an in-court identification, while not approved, will be deemed harmless error where the record shows that the pretrial identification was proper or that the in-court identification of defendant had an origin independent from the pretrial identification.

State v. Jordan, 49 N.C. App. 561, 565, 272 S.E. 2d 405, 408 (1980).…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. GodwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API