Legal Opinion

Waters v. B. F. Ellington & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 1, 1926No. 3310PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The parties to the case agree that the only questions involved in the appeal are (1) whether or not the plaintiff, B. F. Ellington Co., had a valid and subsisting lien on the crops produced in 1925 by the defendant, Virgil J. Waters; and (2) whether or not the lien could be legally forclosed in a suit instituted after Virgil J. Waters had been adjudged a bankrupt and had been granted a discharge in bankruptcy.

First. The trial court correctly decided that B. F. Ellington Co. had a valid and enforceable chattel mortgage lien on the crops produced during the year 1924 as well as during the year…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Perkins v. SterneTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. McDavid v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Blackwell v. BarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Waterfield Mortgage Co. v. Cassi (In Re Cassi)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1982
  2. Excel Finance Camp, Inc. v. TannerhillLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. W. L. Moody Cotton Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  4. First Nat. Bank of Fabens v. American Trust & Savings Bank of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Phelps v. HermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API