Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 8, 1948No. Crim. 2039PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

The petitioners herein allege that the quarantine order of the San Joaquin Local Health District by which they are imprisoned and restrained without bail is illegal in that (1) the county health officer does not have reasonable cause to believe that either of them is infected with any of the diseases specified in sections 2554 and 2571 of the Health and Safety Code, and therefore there is no justification for their quarantine and to deny them bail; (2) the San Joaquin County jail is an improper place to be designated by the said health officer as a place of isolation, and (3) at the time of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. In Re ShepardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. In Re DaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. In Re KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aids Healthcare Foundation v. Los Angeles County Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. In Re HalkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. In Re MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Best Supplement Guide, LLC v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Connelly v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API