Legal Opinion
In Re Martin
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 1948No. Crim. 2039PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
83 Cal.App.2d 164 (1948)
In re DOROTHY MARTIN et al., on Habeas Corpus.
Crim. No. 2039.
California Court of Appeals. Third Dist.
Jan. 8, 1948.
Wyatt, Green & Carr for Petitioners.
Chester E. Watson, District Attorney (Stockton), and Louttit, Marceau, Louttit & Wilson for Respondent.
PEEK, J.
The petitioners herein allege that the quarantine order of the San Joaquin Local Health District by which they are imprisoned and restrained without bail is illegal in that (1) the county health officer does not have reasonable cause to believe that either of them is infected with any of the diseases specified in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte HardcastleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- In Re ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Wragg v. GriffinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- In Re JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- In Re MilsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Givens v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020