In Re Johnson
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, originally made to the Supreme Court, the writ being issued made returnable to the District Court of Appeal. Petitioner re-» manded to custody. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Upon petitioner’s application therefor, the supreme court issued a writ of habeas corpus made returnable to this court after its denial of a similar petition.
It appears from the return to the writ and oral evidence of Dr. Bettin, who is connected with the city health department of Los Angeles, that petitioner was, on November 12, 17, and 22, 1918, with her consent, examined and found to he afflicted with gonococcus infection, and thereupon, by order of the health commissioner of the city, confined in a hospital for treatment, which, with the view of effecting a cure, was administered until…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Ex Parte WhitleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- State ex rel. McBride v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. SomervilleWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People ex rel. Barmore v. RobertsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
- Coelho v. TruckellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Love v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- In Re MilsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Rock v. CarneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.