Legal Opinion
South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Dickinson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 26, 1986No. 22483PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
The respondent had his driver’s license suspended due to his failure to take the breathalyzer test. The hearing officer for the South Carolina Department of Highways and Public Transportation (the Department) sustained the suspension. The circuit court reversed. We affirm the order of the circuit court.
On June 16, 1983 respondent Dickinson was arrested for DUI. He was carried to the police department and offered a breathalyzer test. Due to the respondent’s failure to take this test, the Department suspended his driver’s license. By letter dated July 11, 1983, respondent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coker Ex Rel. Estate of Coker v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
- Davis v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Anders v. South Carolina Parole & Community Corrections BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Montgomery v. KeziahSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
3Cited by15 opinions
- TNS Mills, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In Re the Care & Treatment of MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Employee Resource Management, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
- North Carolina Electric Membership Corp. v. WhiteDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1989
- Charleston County Parents for Public Schools, Inc. v. MoseleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.