Legal Opinion

Coker Ex Rel. Estate of Coker v. Nationwide Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 1, 1968No. 18786PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, Justice:

The South Carolina Motor Vehicle Saftety Responsibility Act requires that each automobile liability insurance policy issued in the State provide uninsured motorist coverage. Such insured motorist coverage includes damages caused by a vehicle whose owner or operator is unkonwn, if there was “physical contact with the .unknown vehicle.” Sections 46-750.31 and 46-750.34, 1967 Supplement to 1962 Code of Laws. The question in this case is whether a collision between an insured’s vehicle and a vehicle with which an unknown motorist was racing constitutes such “physical contact” with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Page v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Skipper v. HartleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. Pulliam v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Ely v. State Farm Ins.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. HowserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  4. Grier v. Amisub of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Blankenbaker v. Great Central Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API