Coker Ex Rel. Estate of Coker v. Nationwide Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, Justice:
The South Carolina Motor Vehicle Saftety Responsibility Act requires that each automobile liability insurance policy issued in the State provide uninsured motorist coverage. Such insured motorist coverage includes damages caused by a vehicle whose owner or operator is unkonwn, if there was “physical contact with the .unknown vehicle.” Sections 46-750.31 and 46-750.34, 1967 Supplement to 1962 Code of Laws. The question in this case is whether a collision between an insured’s vehicle and a vehicle with which an unknown motorist was racing constitutes such “physical contact” with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Page v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Skipper v. HartleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Pulliam v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
3Cited by25 opinions
- United Services Automobile Ass'n AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Ely v. State Farm Ins.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Wausau Underwriters Insurance v. HowserSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Grier v. Amisub of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- Blankenbaker v. Great Central Insurance CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.