Legal Opinion

Everingham v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 21, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

• Appeal from Lee District Court. — IIon. Henry Bank, Jr. Judge. Action to recover damages for an alleged assault made upon plaintiff by one of defendant’s employees. Trial to a jury, directed verdict for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, C. J.

Plaintiff is the owner of an elevator in the town of Et. Madison. A spur track from defendant’s railroad leads to this elevator over defendant’s own land. Cars for plaintiff’s use were to be set out on this spur track, and, when loaded, shipped to the various consignees. He claims that he had very poor switching service, and that he complained thereof to defendant’s general agent at Keokuk. William Tordt -was defendant’s switchman at Et. Madison, having control of the cars which should be switched for use at plaintiff’s elevator. Plaintiff claims that on August 15, 1908, he was delayed in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bass v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Alsever v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Cobb v. SimonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Golden v. NewbrandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  5. Marion v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Turner v. American District Telegraph & Messenger Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Westerland v. Argonaut GrillWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Nesbit v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Mandel v. ByramWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API