Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Bruning

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1966No. S. F. 22197PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandate directing respondent, the County Clerk of San Mateo County, to omit from the ballot to be used in the 1966 direct primary and general elections the office of judge of the Municipal Court of the Central Judicial District, San Mateo County, now held by petitioner. We have concluded that an election for this office in 1966 would be unauthorized by statute, and therefore the writ should be granted.

An election for this office was last held in 1964. In that year Judge W. Howard Hartley, the incumbent and petitioner’s predecessor, was elected at the direct primary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boyd v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. French v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Adams v. DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Dewoody v. BeldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Ahnne v. Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Schweisinger v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Barton v. PanishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Brown v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API