Brown v. Hite
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.
Petitioners, judges of the municipal courts of the Los Angeles and Antelope Judicial Districts, seek a writ of mandate ordering respondent, the registrar of voters for both judicial districts, to omit from the notice of election and from the ballots to be used in the 1966 direct primary election the offices which they hold.
This case presents issues in many respects similar to those discussed in Caldwell v. Bruning, S. F. 22197, ante, page 111 [48 Cal.Rptr. 849, 410 P.2d 353], filed this day, and we have concluded that the offices held by Judges Brown, Higgins, Saeta, and Wright shoulchbe…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyd v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- French v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Adams v. DoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Holbrook v. Board of Directors of Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Topa Ins. Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Barber v. BlueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Barton v. PanishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People ex rel. Superior Court v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- California Attorney General Opinion 24-502, California Attorney General Reports2025