Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wiener v. Abrams

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Leonard Scholnick, J.

Petitioners move for an order, pursuant to CPLR 2304, quashing subpoenae duces tecum served upon them by the Attorney-General of the State of New York. Petitioners further move for an order directing the Attorney-General to turn over information sought in accordance with a Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law, art 6) request made on October 29, 1982. The Attorney-General has cross-moved, pursuant to CPLR 2308 (subd [b]), for an order to compel compliance with the subpoenae. In this regard, the Attorney-General has stated in its motion papers…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Myerson v. Lentini Brothers Moving & Storage Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Virag v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. La Belle Creole International, S. A. v. Attorney-GeneralNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. State v. Princess Prestige Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. New York v. FeldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. State v. Solil Management Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Abrams v. Thruway Food Market & Shopping Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Abrams v. WinterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API