Legal Opinion

In re Bonnell

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 15, 1942No. 4612PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Presiding Judge

In the application here involved appellant seeks patent for a design for “Floor Base Molding or Similar Article.” The appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection of the single claim hy the examiner in view of prior' art, the references cited below being two patents, viz.:

Gardner, 808,312, November 18, 1884.

Wilson, 2,030,73o! February 11, 1936.

We here reproduce figure 1 of appellant’s drawing, figure 1 of the Gardner patent, and.figure 3 of the Wilson patent. [See p. 1105.]

The- claim involved reads: “The ornamental design for a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re RubinfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  2. Application of CampbellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  3. In re RussellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  4. Matter of the Application of Linus E. RussellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  5. Application of Don L. RubinfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API