Legal Opinion

Cupp v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1965No. 41218PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhaedt, Judge.

1. The first special ground of the amended motion assigns error upon the denial of the request to charge on the matter of emergency. Since there is no assignment of error complaining that the charge was not given in the exact language of the written request, this court will only consider whether the request was correct, apt, precisely adjusted to some principle involved in the case and authorized by the evidence; and, if so, whether the request was substantially covered by the general charge. Griffith v. Newman, 217 Ga. 533 (3) (123 SE2d 723); Dillard v. Jackson’s Atlanta &c.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cone v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  2. Smithwick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Ivy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  5. Georgia Casualty Co. v. McRitchieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Santos Rivera v. Quiñones de la RosaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1966
  3. Bailey v. PerrinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Santos Rivera v. Quiñones de La RosaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API