Legal Opinion

Brantley v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 9, 1991No. 1900441PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joe Nathan Brantley appeals from a summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm") regarding uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits.1 The trial court held, as a matter of law, that Brantley's settlement of his claim with Alfa Mutual Insurance Company ("Alfa") without the consent of State Farm was a violation of the "Uninsured Motor Vehicle — Coverage U" provision of the applicable policy. The court, relying on Lowev. Nationwide Insurance Co., 521 So.2d 1309 (Ala. 1988), stated that Brantley's failure to give State Farm notice of his claim impaired…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Lambert v. State FarmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Amerisure Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Downey v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Overstreet v. Safeway Ins. Co. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API