Legal Opinion
State v. Nevler
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 22, 1989No. 87-2388-C-2; CA A48693PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for manufacture and possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(1), (4), asserting that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress. We affirm.
Defendant lives on 40 acres that he owns near Ash-land, along the border of the Rogue River National Forest. There are no fences or other barriers around his land, and there are no “No Trespassing” signs or other indications that defendant wishes to exclude the general public. Except for his house and a nearby garden, the land is unimproved and mountainous.
On August 14, 1987, two sheriffs deputies…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. CiraoloSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Florida v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. AinsworthOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GoinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. VenetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. VenetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990