Legal Opinion

State v. McLellan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 7, 1994No. 93-373PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, Shawn McLellan, appeals his conviction for aggravated felonious sexual assault pursuant to RSA 632-A:2 (Supp. 1993). The defendant argues that the Superior Court (Dickson, J.) erred in choosing as alternates two jurors who thought they knew people affiliated with the defendant, and in denying the defendant’s motion for a mistrial based on a claimed violation of his right against self-incrimination. The defendant also appeals the court’s responses to two jury questions. We affirm.

The defendant was indicted for aggravated felonious sexual assault for “knowingly engaging] in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Jose Armando Ochoa-SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SeymourSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  2. State v. TinkhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  3. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. State v. HammellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API