United States v. Jose Armando Ochoa-Sanchez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Defendant was convicted of illegal importation and possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute. At trial he denied any knowledge that the heroin was in the car. On appeal, he claims primarily that his due process rights were violated by the prosecutor’s use of post-arrest silence to impeach his trial testimony. We affirm.
I. Post-Arrest Silence
On December 15, 1980, defendant drove into the San Ysidro Port of Entry. Responding to the customs inspector’s questions, he said he had visited Mexico for fun and had been there for two or three hours.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Hien Hai Hoac, United States of America v. Hgai Choy ChanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Ronald Olen BurrowsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Paul Deluca, Robert Kaye, James Danno, and John LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Gregory ChristopheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.