Legal Opinion
State v. Spaulding
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 16, 2002No. 2000-527PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
The defendant, Bert Spaulding, Jr., appeals his convictions for multiple counts of aggravated felonious sexual assault and felonious sexual assault against three fifteen-year-old girls, R.D., J.V. and T.O. See RSA632-A:2,1(m), III, :3, II (1996 & Supp. 2001). He asserts that the Superior Court (Morrill, J.) erred in: (1) denying his motions for mistrial based upon alleged violations of his right against self-incrimination; and (2) precluding cross-examination about alleged consensual sexual contact between two of the victims. We affirm.
The following facts were adduced at trial. The defendant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HigginsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State of New Hampshire v. Justin L. RoySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- State v. RemickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. CoombsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.