Tingle v. Cate
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. We deal with the first five enumerations of error together. Basically, the executor’s trover actions have been based on the theory that at the moment of Mary Tingle’s death the right to possess and administer all personal property of the decedent vested in him for purposes of payment of debts and distribution to the exclusion of any considerations relating to the guardianship. The practical effect would be that gross assets, rather than net assets of the guardianship estate would be administered by the executor with a possible resulting change in the priorities of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dowdy v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Knox v. Greenfield EstateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- White v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Stanley v. Laurens County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- State of Arizona v. GreenhawArizona Supreme Court · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cowart Iron Works, Inc. v. Phillips Construction Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1981
- Estate of Alberta Norton v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- MIDLAND NAT. BANK AND TRUST v. Comerica Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Bennett v. L. L. Blocker EstateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- In Re: Carlton Agib BlessingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998