Legal Opinion

Mobbs v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 16, 1990No. CR 90-34PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Amended A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36.4 became effective July 1, 1989. It provides that following the conviction and sentencing the trial judge must address the defendant personally and advise him: (1) that if he wishes to assert his attorney was ineffective, he must file a motion for a new trial within thirty (30) days, and (2) if such a motion is filed, and if it asserts facts sufficient to raise an issue concerning ineffective assistance of counsel, the motion must be heard, and the defendant will have thirty (30) days after the ruling on the motion in which to appeal. In re…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitmore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Preston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Cox v. NorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996
  5. Cravey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API