Legal Opinion

Preston v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 16, 1990No. CR 90-92PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The appellant was convicted of burglary. He does not seek to appeal directly from that judgment of conviction, but instead seeks to appeal from an alleged denial of post-conviction relief. We remand for further proceedings.

In Whitmore v. State, 299 Ark. 55, 771 S.W.2d 266 (1989), we announced a change in post-conviction procedure, and, in In re Abolishment of A.R.Cr.P. Rule 37 & the Revision of A.R.Cr.P. Rule 36, 299 Ark. 573, 770 S.W.2d 148 (1989) (per curiam), adopted the announced change and made the amended rule effective July 1,1989. The amended rule is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whitmore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Mobbs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cravey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Phillips v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  3. GARY ROBINSON v. STATE OF ARKANSASSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Preston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API