Legal Opinion
Barton v. Hertz Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 11, 1999No. 98-1245-CIV-T-17APublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON AMENDED DISPOSITIVE MOTION TO DISMISS AND ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO STRIKE BY DEFENDANT HERTZ
KOVACHEVICH, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the Court on the Amended Dispositive Motion to Dismiss and alternative Motion to Strike (Dkt.20) of Defendant Hertz Corporation, and Plaintiffs response.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Under Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957), a district court should not dismiss a complaint “for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond a doubt that plaintiff can prove no set of facts” that would entitle the plaintiff to relief. 355 U.S. 41, 45,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rickman v. Precisionaire, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Ancata v. Prison Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kelleher v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- Rosenthal v. Ford Motor Co., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Kenneth Horowitz as assignee of Underwater Exploration Company Inc. v. Allied Marine, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2025