Reed v. Gould
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to lug-ham. (Person, J.) Trover. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 93 Mich. 359.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This case was before the Court at
the October term, 1892, and thé decision of the Court is found reported in 93 Mich. 359. As the case was then presented, the action was one in which the plaintiff sued to recover the value of his exemptions in a stock of goods belonging to the firm of Reed & Jacobs, which had been transferred to the defendants, and the judgment was reversed, on the ground that the circuit judge submitted the case to the jury upen a different theory than that claimed in the declaration, and upon which the case was tried. After the case was remanded, the plaintiff amended his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blaker v. SandsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Estabrook v. MessersmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
- Hutchinson v. DuboisMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Miller v. PriceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- Ellis v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Amarillo Nat. Bank v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Ayers v. GenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Bertozzi v. Luigi CollasoArizona Supreme Court · 1920
- Kalamazoo Trust Co. v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Runo v. RothschildMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.