Runo v. Rothschild
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Barton (Joseph), J., presiding. Action commenced by capias ad respondendum by Herman H. Runo against Douglas Rothschild. Judgment dismissing writ. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.
This action was commenced by capias ad respondendum. Upon his arrest defendant moved to quash the writ and dismiss the suit; one ground of the motion being that plaintiff’s affidavit for the writ stated his claim arose out of partnership relations with defendant and, therefore, his remedy is by way of an accounting and not an action at law and the arrest of his copartner. The motion was granted, the writ quashed and the suit dismissed and plaintiff has brought the case here by writ of error.
The parts of plaintiff’s affidavit for the writ, bearing upon the relations of the parties, follows:
“Tha…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- McAlpine v. MillenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Bartelt v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Sullivan v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Reed v. GouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Byker v. MannesMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
- Falkner v. FalknerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Dinkelspeel v. LewisWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- McCormick v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Dinkelspeel v. LewisWyoming Supreme Court · 1936