Legal Opinion

Gans v. Harmison

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Eau Claire County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. The defend ■ ant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, J\

I. This cause was tried by a jury at the September term, 1876, of Ean Claire circuit, and a verdict rendered for the plaintiff, on which judgment was immediately entered. November 2'3d, the costs were taxed and inserted in the judgment, and, on the defendant’s motion, a stay of proceedings was granted for sixty days, to enable him to move for a new trial. At the last day of the term, the court granted a further order, as of the term, for the plaintiff to show cause why the judgment should not be set aside and a new trial had, which motion, by consent of parties, was set for hearing at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilson v. PlankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Kurath v. Gove Automobile Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Toledo Scale Co. v. ColleranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API