Gans v. Harmison
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Eau Claire County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. The defend ■ ant appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Cole, J\
I. This cause was tried by a jury at the September term, 1876, of Ean Claire circuit, and a verdict rendered for the plaintiff, on which judgment was immediately entered. November 2'3d, the costs were taxed and inserted in the judgment, and, on the defendant’s motion, a stay of proceedings was granted for sixty days, to enable him to move for a new trial. At the last day of the term, the court granted a further order, as of the term, for the plaintiff to show cause why the judgment should not be set aside and a new trial had, which motion, by consent of parties, was set for hearing at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wilson v. PlankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Kurath v. Gove Automobile Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Toledo Scale Co. v. ColleranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Seaman Body Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934