Legal Opinion
In Re Seelig
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 24, 2004PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Poritz
Respondent Jack L. Seelig was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New Jersey in 1972. He has been a certified Criminal Trial Attorney for more than two decades and had not been the subject of disciplinary proceedings before this matter arose. On September 22, 2000, however, the District III-B Ethics
*237Committee (Burlington County) filed a complaint alleging that respondent had violated Rule of Professional Conduct (1984) (RPC) 1.6(b)(2) (“A lawyer shall reveal such information to the proper authorities, as soon as, and to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary, to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Kernan v. One Washington Park Urban Renewal AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brundage v. Estate of CarambioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- State v. JacksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- State v. ColonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Tax Authority, Inc. v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- In re HyderallySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.