Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Barnhart

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 6, 1992No. 92-3142PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

Charles Barnhart, the appellant, violated his probation by failing to report to his probation officer on three separate occasions. After Barnhart’s probation was revoked by the district court, he was sentenced to five years imprisonment. On appeal, Barnhart claims he was denied due process at the time he was sentenced because the district court was influenced by three unrelated arrests made while Barn-hart was on probation. Barnhart also claims that the district court wrongfully revoked his probation because of his status as an alcoholic. Finding no…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Dwaine CopelandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Barry Davis, A/K/A "Mark Johnson"Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. DeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  4. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Wilhelm MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  5. Trice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API