Legal Opinion

State v. . Rose

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 18, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

Tbe assignments of error on this appeal are based on defendant’s exception to tbe refusal of tbe court to instruct tbe jury that defendant was presumed to be innocent of tbe crime with which be is charged in tbe warrant, and to state to tbe jury tbe contentions of tbe defendant, as requested by bis counsel at tbe conclusion of tbe charge to tbe jury. This is tbe only exception appearing in tbe record, except tbe formal exception to tbe refusal of tbe court to set aside tbe verdict and grant a new trial.

Tbe evidence offered by tbe State, if believed by tbe jury, was of sufficient probative…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . MeyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. State v. . BoswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. State v. . RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. . BowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. . EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. EppsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API