Legal Opinion

United States v. Carothers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 24, 2011No. 10-50191PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

John Wilhelm Carothers was charged with possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. Although Carothers essentially conceded at trial that he possessed methamphetamine at the time he was arrested, he insisted that he had no intent to distribute it. Perhaps because of Carothers’ concession, his trial centered on the contested element of the charged offense — the intent to distribute.

At Carothers’ request, the district court instructed the jury on the lesser included offense of simple possession as well as on possession with intent to distribute. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Spaziano v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robert Lemke v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. BARBARIN v. ScribnerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  3. Brewer v. NeuschmidDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. Carlos Noguera v. Greg SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Carothers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API