Legal Opinion

Robert Lemke v. Charles Ryan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2013No. 11-15960PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANBY, Senior Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Robert D. Lemke appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Lemke contends that subjecting him to retrial for felony murder violated the Double Jeopardy Clause because a jury earlier had impliedly acquitted him of the robbery underlying the felony murder charge. We conclude that the Arizona Court of Appeals’ holding that double jeopardy did not bar Lemke’s retrial was not “contrary to, or ... an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Konolus Smith v. Garry SwarthoutCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Freddie Crespin v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  4. Grimes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  5. Rawles v. Holt, WardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API