Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stockdale v. Lester

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 9, 1968No. 52772Published

1Dissent

LARSON, Justice.

I respectfully dissent.

I. As the majority concedes, restrictions on the free use of property are strictly construed against the party seeking to enforce them; they will not be extended by implication or construction beyond the clear and unambiguous meaning of their terms. All doubts will be resolved in favor of the unrestricted use of the property. Jones v. Beiber, 251 Iowa 969, 971, 972, 103 N.W.2d 364, 365; Maher v. Park Homes, Inc., 258 Iowa 1291, 1296, 1297, 142 N.W.2d 430, 434. See also Albrecht v. State Highway Commission (Mo.), 363 S.W.2d 643, 645, and citations; Bove…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corp. v. Music & Television Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  2. Friesen v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. City of Houston v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Anderson v. LynchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Jones v. BeiberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API