Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Swarr, May, Smith & Anderson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1991No. 89-436PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch,J.

Complaining that the trial court erred in granting the defendant lawyers a new trial, the appellants, Ronald Patterson and his wife, Carol Patterson, request that this court reinstate a $1,114,600 legal malpractice jury verdict in their favor.

In their petition, the Pattersons alleged that the defendant attorneys negligently represented them in their chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization.

After the jury verdict was returned, the district court for Douglas County granted a new trial because of Ronald Patterson’s testimonial reference to the defendants’ having insurance.

By cross-appeal, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ArchboldNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. McVaney v. BAIRD, HOLM, McEACHENNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. McCune v. NeitzelNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Kumar v. Douglas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Turner v. WelliverNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. World Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Keegan v. First Bank of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wilson v. MiskoNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Richardson v. GriffithsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. McWhirt v. HeaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API