Legal Opinion

ADT v. Bay State Optical Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 23, 1915No. 1123PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Alassachusetts; Frederic Dodge, Judge. Suit iu equity by Leo F. Adt against the Bay State Optical Company. Decree for defendant, and complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, District Judge.

This case is before us, on appeal by complainant from a decree of the District Court for the District of Massa*926chusetts, dismissing the bill. The suit is for the alleged infringement of certain claims in five letters patent of the United States, to wit:

1. No. 13,466, application filed July 16, 1912, reissued September 17, 1912.

2. No. 1,019,214, application filed November 6, 1909, issued March 5, 1912.

3. No. 1,019,116, application filed September 18, 1907, issued March 3, 1912.

4. No. 1,019,117, application filed November 3, 1909, issued March 5, 1912.

5. No. 1,040,096,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Railroad Supply Co. v. Hart Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
  2. Birmingham Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Gates Iron WorksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1896
  3. Chicago Grain Door Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
  4. Æolian Co. v. WanamakerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bourns, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Respro, Inc. v. SydemanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1926
  3. Adt v. E. Kirstein Sons Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1918
  4. Aluminum Co. v. Sterling Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. Aluminum Co. v. Sterling Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API