Legal Opinion

Aluminum Co. v. Sterling Products Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1933No. 9538Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

In the motion for rehearing emphasis is placed upon the contention that onr decision is in conflict with that of this court in Donner v. Sheer Pharmaeal Corporation, 64 F.(2d) 217. Wo have given full consideration to the latter ease and find no conflict in the views expressed. In the Donner Case the rule announced is that, “if description in patent is such that one skilled in art can follow it and produce result which patent claims, it is sufficiently certain.” It was held that the description in that case was sufficient under that rule. In the ease at bar both the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Donner v. Sheer Pharmacal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Carlton v. BokeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. ADT v. Bay State Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1915
  5. Anchor Cap & Closure Corp. v. LinhardtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API