Legal Opinion

Aluminum Co. v. Sterling Products Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1933No. 9538PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

This suit involves five patents numbered and described as follows:

Letters patent No. 1,296,588 to J. H. Bamberg, Inventor, for “Metal Mold”; letters patent No. 1,296,589 to J. H. Bamberg, for “Casting and process of making same”; letters patent No. 3,296,500 to J. H. Bamberg, for “Metal Mold”; letters patent No. 3,296,591 to J. H. Bamberg, for “Piston Casting”; letters patent No. 3,296,595 to A. B. Norton, for “Process of making Castings.” Of these patents Nos. 3,296,588 and 1,296,500 are machine patents; No. 1,296,591 is a product patent; No. 3,296,595 is a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McCormick v. TalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Electric Railroad Signal Co. v. Hall Railway Signal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Western Willite Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Carlton v. BokeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Automatic Appliance Co. v. McNiece Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bourns, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API