Legal Opinion
O'KANE v. Catuira
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1963No. Civ. 20548; Civ. 20549; Civ. 20550PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.
Plaintiff, Superintendent of Banks appeals from judgments rendered in three consolidated actions refusing to enjoin defendants from engaging in the business of transmitting moneys from the United States to the Philippines.
In 1960, plaintiff commenced three separate actions for injunctions under Financial Code, section 3395, against defendants Jaime Catuira and Catuira and Associates, Inc.; against defendant Rubin Mendoza, an individual doing business under the fictitious name of Sonomatic Philippines; and against defendant N. N. Morabe, an individual doing business under the fictitious name…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Blumenthal v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Wedesweiler v. BrundageIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- John Tennant Memorial Homes, Inc. v. City of Pacific GroveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Magan Medical Clinic v. Cal. State Bd. of Med. ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Eberle v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- McMahon v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Board of Osteopathic Examiners v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.