Legal Opinion

Utilities Production Corp. v. Carter Oil Co.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1933No. 560PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

The purpose of plaintiff’s bill is to obtain an injunction against the defendant’s use of residue gas, as well as an accounting for residue gas used by defendant. Plaintiff is the gas lessee in gas leases covering and affecting lands allotted to members of the Osage Tribe of Indians. The lands are commonly referred to as the Osage Nation. The defendant, Carter Oil Company, is the oil lessee of oil leases covering fourteen .tracts of the land on which plaintiff has gas leases. Section 3 of the Act of Congress approved June 28, 1906, 34 Statute at Large,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lyons Milling Co. v. Goffe & Carkener, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Hall v. Philadelphia Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bassell v. West Virginia Central Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Jones v. Forest Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Hattiesburg Lumber Co. v. HerrickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Company v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Ivey v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1941
  3. Loup County v. RumbaughNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Ledoux v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
  5. Sun Oil Company v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API