Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sun Oil Company v. Whitaker

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1972No. B-2300Published

1DissentDaniel, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I adhere to that portion of the majority opinion which restates the general rule that, unless otherwise provided by contractual provisions, an oil and gas lessee has an implied right or easement to make such use of underground water as may be reasonably necessary for ordinary and customary primary drilling and producing operations. However, I completely disagree with the majority’s extension of this “implied easement” doctrine so as to permit Sun also to take, consume and deplete an enormously greater quantity of water for a vastly different repressur-ing and secondary…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Company v. WhitakerTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Getty Oil Company v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Heinatz v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Acker v. GuinnTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  5. The Texas Co. v. BurkettTexas Supreme Court · 1927

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API