Legal Opinion

Jones v. Forest Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1900No. Appeal, No. 188PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal, No. 188, Oct. T., 1899, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1899, No. 256, dismissing bill in equity. Bill in equity for an injunction to restrain the defendant from using a gas pump-in an oil well. The facts appear by-the opinion of Frazer, J., which was as follows: ' FINDINGS OF FACT.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 188, Oct. T., 1899, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., July T., 1899, No. 256, dismissing bill in equity. Bill in equity for an injunction to restrain the defendant from using a gas pump-in an oil well. The facts appear by-the opinion of Frazer, J., which was as follows: ' FINDINGS OF FACT. From the bill, answer and testimony taken at the trial, we find the following facts : 1. The plaintiff is the owner in fee simple of a tract of land situate in Robinson township, this county, generally known as the W. H. Kelso farm, bounded by lands of Tidball, Boyce…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Though this particular question is somewhat of a novelty the principles which control it are very familiar and perfectly well *386settled. They are well expressed in the opinion of the learned court below and on the findings of fact and conclusions of law there contained we affirm the decree.

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Gas Products Co. v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. StateTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Crain v. Pure Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  5. White v. New York State Natural Gas CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API